• Home
  • SOCRATES’ THINKING
    • News and comment
    • Editorial
  • About
  • US
    • Sportsocratic team
    • Contributors
  • Reviews
    • Adventures
    • Books
    • Places
  • Contributions
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Sportsocratic

Thoughts, ideas, opinions and postulations on sport and adventuring

  • Sport & society
    • Ethics & Values
    • History
    • Favourite photos
    • Cultural and social issues
    • Politics
    • Big questions
    • Sport fashion
      • Sartorialism and style
  • Wild sports
  • Silly stuff
  • Sports science
    • Research
    • Coaching
    • Innovation
    • HEALTH
  • The things that made me
  • Stories
    • General sporting stories
    • Waves of Pain
      • No Respect!
      • Death Wish at Fairy Bower
      • Fried nuts
      • The ocean is a trickster… especially Hawaii’s North Shore – Gas chambers bites the unwary!
      • Titus Kinimaka’s nightmare Christmas
      • Dix dumped – the trials of a self-confessed elite body surfer
      • The little surf that nearly ruined a promising career…
      • Rabbit killer – a master takes a caning at pipeline!
      • Death Wish at Fairy Bower
      • Easternmost memory – surfing in the wild at the end of the continent
      • Nothing ruins a good surf like a couple of blokes with automatic assault rifles…
      • Agony for Miki Dora
      • Smashed at Gas Chambers
      • Who was Europe’s first surfing woman? Introducing the wonderful Witch of Newbury.
      • A bad day at Palmy – surfies and clubbies at war!
      • When being a proven waterman is not enough!
      • The highs and lows of surfing Sunset Beach while competing at the Duke Kahanamoku Invitational
      • An American midnight surf – that goes very wrong!
  • What does it mean?
    • What is a snake?
    • What does “shag” mean?
    • What does “Freddy Jones” mean?
    • What does “hook and ladder” mean?
    • What does back walk-over mean?
  • Philosophers Sport Bar
    • Socrates and Aristotle debate football defence
    • Michel de Montaigne on coaching sports
    • Ancient philosophers discuss what makes the beautiful game beautiful! Laozi and Socrates get technical.

Socrates and the cranky coach…

August 17, 2022 By TIMOTHY EDWARDS Leave a Comment Filed Under: Coaching, Sports science

Socrates is sitting on the steps at the local gym when he notices one of the Australian National Rugby League’s (NRL) most famous veteran coaches approaching the front door. The coach sees the old hooker/philosopher and realizes that it’s too late to turn around and run off… but he isn’t in the mood to be harassed by the busybody sports thinker today. Socrates doesn’t miss a beat. He jumps to his feet and purposefully strolls up to the coach who nervously flicks his fringe of greying blond hair to one side.

Socrates: Hoi… coach! Great to see you. What’s up?

Coach: Hey Socrates. Nuthins’ up. Just got time for a quick workout before the lads arrive for practice. No time for chatting today.

Socrates: Coach. A quick question before you work on your abs. I’ve noticed that you sometimes get a bit upset when your players are penalized by referees more often than your opponents. Is that fair to say?

It’s hard for coaches to stay calm when it feels like the officials are against them.

Coach: Oh geez! Well, not if I think my boys are guilty of poor disciple. If they have been penalized fairly I get pissed off with them – not with the ref! But it’s true that I teach my blokes good disciple… and it twists my nuts when I see opposition players getting away with murder while my guys are getting hammered by the ref.

Socrates: So you think that some teams cheat and manage to get away with it?

Coach: Yeah. Sometimes I think that that’s true. For sure!

Socrates: How would you define the word “cheat”, coach?”

Coach: Well, that’s obvious! When someone breaks the rules, of course.

Socrates: Really? Don’t people break the rules all the time?

Coach: Well, I guess that’s true to some degree. Players accidently getting off-side… or accidently blocking a defender… or doing something technically illegal in a play the ball or a scrum.

Socrates: Should such rule breaches always be penalized then?

Coach: Of course not. It’s not cheating if you break the rules but don’t get any advantage out of it.

Socrates: Well then… would that change your definition of “cheating”?

Coach: Maybe you are right. Maybe cheating is where you get an unfair advantage over your opponent.

Socrates: So you think that sometimes your team’s opponents are given an unfair advantage?

Coach: Not always. But it happens. And it boils my bollocks! Some teams seem to pull it off more than others, too.

That’s right. Pick him up and carry him backwards.

Socrates: Without getting personal give me an example. What is one situation where some other teams are given an unfair advantage?

Coach: That’s easy. Some teams kick into the corners then have at least two kick chasers hit the kick returner. The chasers then hold the bloke with the ball up while a third defender grabs his legs (picks him up by his legs) then they carry him back… sometimes five meters. Bloody commentators call it great defence. They call it pinning a team to their goal line. I call it bollocks. Usually the bloke has surrendered at the first hit. He’s tackled. The ref should call “held” and let the bloke play the ball. But often the ref doesn’t say a thing until the runner has lost five meters. Then the poor bugger has to play the ball almost on their goal line. The same team will try the same thing on the second and third tackles too if the ref will let them. It’s blatant cheating and the ref lets them get away with it.

Socrates: I can see how you would think that this qualifies as cheating under your current definition. But would you still think it cheating if the referee allowed your team to do it too?

Coach: Hmmm. I might have to think about that.

Socrates: I used to play hooker for the Athens Rugby Union team a couple of thousand years ago. Now I know that Rugby and Rugby League are a bit different but let me give you an example from Rugby that might make some sense. That was way back in the days when hookers, in rugby scrums, used to strike for the ball and scrum halves had to put the ball pretty much into the middle of the scrum rather than feed it straight into the second row. The rules said that I could not strike for the ball until the ball landed in the scrum. Knowing that I would have a delayed reaction time, I used to strike for the ball when I saw the scrum half release the ball when feeding it into the scrum. Do you think that I was cheating?

Coach: Not if your foot didn’t move until the ball landed in the scrum.

Socrates: Sometimes my foot probably moved a fraction before the ball bounced in the scrum. Sometimes the ref would be fine with that. The ref isn’t holding a slow-motion movement detection device that peeks inside a scrum. So they have to make a “line-ball” call. But sometimes I would get penalized. What do you think of that?

The ball has to clear the ruck

Coach: Different referees interpret the rules slightly differently… or see things slightly differently I suppose.

Socrates: I guess so. So much so that I used to make it my business, early in every game, to work out just how early a referee would allow me to strike for the ball. That usually meant that I would give away a penalty early on but once I had an idea of how the ref interpreted the rules I was cool after that. Is that cheating? Was I a cheat? Would you call me a cheat?

Coach: I’m not sure. Maybe. But you’re not really trying to get an unfair advantage. You’re just trying to play the game by the way the ref sees the rules. To not do this is to give your opponent an unfair advantage.

Socrates: Actually, I don’t give a damned if you wanna call me a cheat. I’ve been called worse. I’m much more interested in what you think about rules. Are “the rules” always black and white?

Coach: I guess not. I suppose that sometimes there is a fine line between what is legal and what is not legal.

Socrates: So would it be cheating if your opponents… and your team’s players, as well… got away with that trick of carrying the kick returner back to their goal line?

Coach: I guess not.

Socrates: So… you believe that so long as both teams are allowed to use a particular tactic that some might consider not strictly within the rules of the game then that is okay?

Coach: Well… I suppose you have convinced me of that. Yes.

Socrates: So how does all this impact upon your role as a coach?

Coach: What has coaching got to do with it?

Socrates: Well, let me put that another way. Those teams that use the “carry the kick returner backwards” ploy. Do you think that they came up with this themselves or was it something they were taught?

Coach: I see where you are coming from. You are saying that it is a coach’s job to teach players how to cheat.

Socrates: Am I? I thought we decided that if a referee allows both teams to use a tactic that might push the edge of “the rules” envelope then there is no unfair advantage and that it is not cheating. Am I wrong?

Socrates knew a lot about laws and uncertainty. Despite not breaking any rules at all the Athenian people voted that he had to drink the hemlock!

Coach: Okay. You’re saying that if a coach doesn’t teach his or her players to play the game to the ref’s interpretation of the rules then it is the coach who is responsible for his team having an unfair disadvantage.

Socrates: You said it. But I wouldn’t disagree with that.

Coach: But what if a referee’s personal interpretation of the rules was ruining the game… or the referee was allowing one team to do stuff that they wouldn’t let the other team do?

Socrates: Well, that seems to be a completely different matter. What would you say about that?

Coach: Well the administrators of the sport would have to take a fresh look at the rules…. or look at how the refs were being coached… or at the performance of the refs themselves.

Socrates: That seems fair enough to me. Here is another quick question. There are several teams in your NRL competition where many coaches, players, and fans complain that they are constantly “off-side” but still get away with it. What do you think of that?

Coach: Yeah. I’ve harboured a suspicion for a while that some of the more “blessed” teams seem to have more leeway from the refs when they charge up in defence after the play the ball.

Socrates: Really? Explain what constitutes “off-side” in such situations. What do the rules say?

Coach: The rules say that the line of defenders cannot start moving up until the ball has been played and it clears the ruck (the play the ball). If one or more defenders charge up in defence before the ball has cleared the ruck then they have committee a ruck infringement.

Socrates: “Cleared the ruck?” What does “cleared the ruck mean?”

Coach: The tackled player must roll the ball back to the dummy half who is standing behind him using his foot to roll the ball.

Socrates: So is the ball clear of the ruck when the tackled player’s foot is no longer touching the ball… or when the ball emerges from under his feet… or when the ball is fully away from his feet? Surely these questions are significant in that the answer constitutes the moment when the defensive line can launch.

“Ref? Are you serious?”

Coach: Yes. That’s right. And, no! I don’t know the answer. I guess there is no certainty about precisely when the ball clears the ruck. But usually the refs advise the defensive team to “hold” until they think the ball has cleared the ruck and then signal that they are free to move by saying “clear”. So… the refs usually give the players a fairly good idea of what they are thinking. But still, there is no certainty here either. One has to account for the delay of a ref making the call. If a defensive line move fractionally before the ref’s call maybe the ref will be okay with that.

Socrates: Ah! No certainty! Well said. So is it possible that “no certainty” is the crux of the matter? In sport… or in life, in general, it is rarely helpful to expect or hope for certainty, because, as you suggested, it doesn’t exist. Hoping for black and white answers and rulings will lead to disappointment. Actually, I got kneed in the bollocks in a basketball game during a jump ball once. The bastard didn’t even jump. Just stuck his knee out. That was pretty black and white. He got ejected on the spot. But back to the teams that seem to be “off-side” all the time and get away with it. What’s going on there? Are they really “off-side”?

Coach: Well, it’s similar to the way you used to strike for the ball in rugby union scrums. You would push the edge of the envelope to figure out what the ref thought was a fair strike for the ball. But geez, Socrates. Rugby League is a simple game. Simple rules. We’re simple folks. Don’t you think you are overthinking it?

Socrates: Wasn’t it you who said that some teams are getting away with being offside. You also said some teams are allowed to carry their attacking opponents back to the goal line despite the player being tackled. Don’t these issues warrant some thought? Isn’t it a bit too simple to blame the referees? I’m not suggesting that we should try to make the game more complex. Let’s keep it simple, for sure. Even a sports philosopher believes in simplicity. But since uncertainty is the only certainty you can expect with referees (and rules) surely you and your team should prepare for that? Besides… what could be simpler and more straight forward than attempting to be the team that has the fastest straight line in defence? How important is it for a team to have a quick defensive line?

Coach: It couldn’t be more important. It’s a huge advantage. We do a lot of defensive practice and we even practice speed in the defensive line, but we don’t really practice the timing of the defensive line taking off. Perhaps some teams are coached to have their straight line of defence rush forward slightly before the ball clears the ruck just to see how the ref will react. If they keep a nice straight line it kinda makes them look less like they are off-side, I suppose.

Socrates: So… again… it’s more of a coaching matter than a refereeing matter. Teams need to be coached to deal with uncertainty. Teams need to be ready to react to different ways that the referee might interpret the rules. Teams need to practice to take advantage of any leeway that the referee might give them. As you suggested, it’s not a matter of cheating or getting an unfair advantage.

Coach: This is a huge issue. Earlier in the season we lost a game where the opposition gave away two penalties in eighty minutes of football… and my blokes gave away twelve… even with me ranting to them about discipline. And guess what. The bastards on the other team scored nearly every one of their tries on the back of one of our penalties. We scored a similar number of tries but had to do it without any ref assistance.

No. Ricky is not the coach depicted in this story. But I bet he sometimes feels like him.

Socrates: So… what do you think that that means?

Coach: Well, I guess its not so much a matter of harping on at my players about following the rules because, maybe, while “the rules” might seem black and white, their interpretation can be subjective. I need to coach my players to deal with shades of grey – with uncertainty. The leaders in the squad need to know what the refs expect of them and the team and to give the refs what they want… even if they think the ref is wrong. And we need to practice hard at those areas of uncertainty. If we keep doing things that we think are okay, but the ref doesn’t like, we will keep losing games. Our fault!

Socrates: That makes sense to me.

Coach: Okay. Now can I ask a question?

Socrates: Of course. Sure. Go right ahead.

Coach: Has anybody ever told you that you are annoying… with all those questions? Oh… and can I go in the gym now?

TIMOTHY EDWARDS

Tim Edwards has had a completely rubbish sporting career so it is odd that he seems so obsessed with sport and adventuring. As a basketball shooting guard he had an okay jump shot but couldn't do anything else. As a rugby hooker he spent more time puking then actually playing. As a runner he won an awful lot of consolation prize chocolates for coming fourth but almost never won a ribbon. Despite his inadequacies he still loves sport and has opinions on almost any sporting subject. Tim has spent large parts of his working life in publishing and writing roles and has even done his share of teaching sport management to Uni students. He has coached more sports teams than he cares to remember. Tim is an awful surfer and skier but his lack of competence does not bother him one little bit!

Support Sportsocratic

Thanks for reading this story! We appreciate your visit to Sportsocratic… and love providing alternative information, opinions and angles from the sporting world. The world of sport is so full of the same old stuff from the same old sources that it drives us nuts… and it makes our day giving voice to less orthodox views. If you appreciate our free service, give some thought to helping us out. It costs us big bucks to keep Sportsocratic going but, if our readers support us, our future is much more secure.

Help us to keep you entertained and informed… and enable Socrates to keep asking those big philosophical sporting questions.

Support Sportsocratic for as little as a $1 and we would love you to bits. It only takes a few seconds!

Support Us

Tagged With: cheating, coaching, NRL, referees, rules, Socrates

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

SOCRATES’ RECENT TWEETS

Tweets by Sportsocratic

Secret Sports Person

Their sporting life – A journalist’s story

April 7, 2021 By SOCRATES Leave a Comment

“Bill” could have been a great rugby player… but he was more interested in other things. Do people display characteristics of their personal and working lives through their performances on the sporting field? Socrates describes the sporting life of one of his favorite people, and shows how the skill and character of one of Australia’s best journalists was always on show, even as a young man, whether on the rugby field, the basketball court or even on a quiet country headland when threatened with fisticuff by a big bloke wearing a blue uniform. Get “Bill’s” story here. Click the pic!

Olympics Rugby Teams – Who are the greatest?

April 23, 2020 By SOCRATES Leave a Comment

The rugby trivia question for the century! Which national rugby union team holds the record for the most Olympic gold medals in Rugby Union (the full-team fifteen a side game)?

Ethics and fairplay

Wallaby v France test – the moment that soared above all the others

July 20, 2021 By SOCRATES Leave a Comment

There were many great moments in the final Wallabies versus France rugby test last week but according to Socrates, one stood our far above all the others. Was it a great try? A brilliant tackle? A perfect scrum or line-out? A fantastic bit of work at the break-down? According to the rotund Greek hooker it was none of those things. He reckons that the highlight of the game was a much quieter, simpler and more subdued moment. A moment that might have escaped the attention of millions of spectators. Find out about Socrates favorite moment of the test. Click the pic.

Never cheated in my life!

November 19, 2020 By SOCRATES Leave a Comment

What is cheating? Is cheating a black and white moral issue… or are there shades of gray. Socrates spent twenty years in the engine room of the beautiful game of rugby… the scrum. He loved being a rugby hooker. He reckons that being slap bang in the middle of sixteen enormous, sweating blokes desperate to secure possession of the ball for their team taught him quite a bit about the fine art of cheating… what it is… and what it isn’t…. and how it can be done. Here Socrates lifts the veil on aspects of the workings of the 1970’s and 80’s amateur rugby scrum revealing some of its secrets. In so doing he shows that cheating is not a simple moral issue. he also claims to haver never deliberately cheated. Do you believe him?

matildas

Just six words…

May 20, 2021 By TIMOTHY EDWARDS 1 Comment

Have you ever wished that you could meet and have a conversation with someone you idolize? What would you say to your idol to convince them to want to stay in the conversation? What would they say in response to your brilliant social skills? How would the conversation go? How would it leave you feeling? An Australian ex-professional athlete who had played with and against some of the greatest basketball talent that this country has ever seen (Andrew Gaze, Ricky Grace, Shane Heal, Phil Smythe) once, by chance, had a meeting with possibly the greatest and most famous professional sports person that has ever lived. The superstar he bumped into, in a New York elevator, just happened to be the Aussie basketballer’s idol. How did the meeting turn out? Click the pic and discover the six most memorable words in this Australian point guard’s life.

Outstanding achievement

RITUAL: BEING CHAIRED UP THE BEACH

September 13, 2022 By SOCRATES Leave a Comment

Why do we subject professional athletes to embarrassing and cumbersome rituals at times when they should be celebrating. Why do athletes agree to participate in rituals that make them look like nongs? Chas Smith makes the argument for banning the post-contest victory chair-up-the-beach. Click the pic to get Chas’ important advice to the world of contest surfing.

New surfing podcast

One of Australia’s greatest ever surfers – one of surfing’s greatest story tellers – “Rabbit” Bartholomew – talks to award winning journalist Tim Baker about life, surfing and stuff. Perfect listening for lockdown entertainment.

professionalism

To smash or be skillful? Can good defense be coached or are accidents like the Latrell Mitchell and Joey Manu incident inevitable?

August 31, 2021 By SOCRATES NEWS DESK Leave a Comment

In a tough body contact sport are occasional horrible accidents inevitable? Possibly. But probably not with the frequency that many former elite players and expert analysts argue. Socrates believes that good coaching and hard work from highly skilled players can prevent many potentially dangerous tackles and that accepting the horror accidents as inevitable and high level skills as “uncoachable” sells athletes, professional sports and coaches short. Get the story here. Click the pic.

wisdom

Its just a job. Grass grows. Birds fly. Waves pound the sand. I beat people up. – Muhammad Ali

sport at mardi gras

Athletes in the LGBTQI Mardi Gras

March 12, 2019 By SOCRATES 2 Comments

Twenty-one different sports teams marched in this years Sydney Mardi Gras. That’s twenty-one groups of out and proud queer athletes. The LGBTQI community need to be “fearless” and queer athletes are no exception. Check out these fearless sporting clubs living it up on their night of night!

A life with horses

A life with horses – or Lulu in wonderland

August 8, 2018 By TIMOTHY EDWARDS Leave a Comment

It’s well known that playing sport can be a life-changing experience. For one mum, adventurer and businessperson, having a sporty pastime was more than life-changing. Lulu’s friendship with her horses has touched her and her daughter’s lives in a million ways and created a whole new life in an ever-changing wonderland for them both. But don’t think for a moment that their horses are the purpose built catalysts for their ideal lives! Its way more complex than that… and more respectful. Read on! It’s worth it!

wisdom

“Pressure? Pressure is a Messerschmidt up your arse. Playing cricket is not!”

Keith Miller

One of the greatest cricket “all-rounders” of all time, Keith Miller was not only an exceptional performer in multiple elements of test cricketing (batting, bowling and fielding) but he was also gifted in numerous other aspects of his life. Witty, entertaining, handsome, a renowned war time pilot and gifted Australian Rules Footballer, Miller was famed for calling a spade a spade and acknowledging that there was much more to life than elite sports. Having flown fighter bombers in the Second World War under life threatening circumstances he was not one to take the “pressure” of high level sport too seriously!

trivia

Here is a cracker of a trivia question.

Who was the college recruiting scout talking about when he said the following to his head coach.

“I’ve just seen a fat guy… who can play like the wind!”

Yup. The same guy who told people that just because they had shoes like his, it didn’t make them like him in any other way. Charles Wade Barkley.

Etymology

Are surfers sheep?

January 26, 2023 By SOCRATES Leave a Comment

Where do you surf? What’s your primary source of information about where is the best place to choose to surf? Over several weeks I watched the surfing grape-vine drag punters from one surfing spot to the next according to what the latest “word” was telling them about where they needed to surf. It made me wonder whether many surfers were just happier being part of the mob than in actually surfing great waves. It wasn’t long before I discovered that more people suffer from the sheep syndrome than I originally imagined. It is a powerful disease.

What does it mean?

What is Elvis leg?

Admit it. You’ve never heard of “Elvis leg,” have you? What the blazes is “Elvis leg?” As is the case with every other “What does it mean…” story we have ever posted, the answer is not directly related to the name itself. It is indirectly related to Elvis, though. Have a guess what the relationship is… then click here and check out whether your were correct. Find out for certain which sport uses this term and what it means.

What is a liberator?

Of course most you aviation buffs will think that a liberator is an American WW2 heavy bomber. Fair enough. But in a sporting context does it have a completely different meaning? Indeed it does. You are going to have to click here to find out what a liberator is and does in the world of sport.

Aphorisms, insights and wisdom

“The thing that’s depressing about tennis is that no matter how good I get I will never be as good as a wall.”

More perceptive sporting analysis from Mitch Hedberg, comic genius.

 

ebook

Phillip has returned to the south of India after eighteen years. But who is the young girl staying in his hotel? And what will he learn about his estranged brother through Inez, the Spanish backpacker?

To buy The Bangalore Test, John Campbell’s new ebook novella, just click the link.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

©2019 Sportsocratic