• Home
  • SOCRATES’ THINKING
    • News and comment
    • Editorial
  • About
  • US
    • Sportsocratic team
    • Contributors
  • Reviews
    • Adventures
    • Books
    • Places
  • Contributions
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Sportsocratic

Thoughts, ideas, opinions and postulations on sport and adventuring

  • Sport & society
    • Ethics & Values
    • History
    • Favourite photos
    • Cultural and social issues
    • Politics
    • Big questions
    • Sport fashion
      • Sartorialism and style
  • Wild sports
  • Silly stuff
  • Sports science
    • Research
    • Coaching
    • Innovation
    • HEALTH
  • The things that made me
  • Stories
    • General sporting stories
    • Waves of Pain
      • No Respect!
      • Death Wish at Fairy Bower
      • Fried nuts
      • The ocean is a trickster… especially Hawaii’s North Shore – Gas chambers bites the unwary!
      • Titus Kinimaka’s nightmare Christmas
      • Dix dumped – the trials of a self-confessed elite body surfer
      • The little surf that nearly ruined a promising career…
      • Rabbit killer – a master takes a caning at pipeline!
      • Death Wish at Fairy Bower
      • Easternmost memory – surfing in the wild at the end of the continent
      • Nothing ruins a good surf like a couple of blokes with automatic assault rifles…
      • Agony for Miki Dora
      • Smashed at Gas Chambers
      • Who was Europe’s first surfing woman? Introducing the wonderful Witch of Newbury.
      • A bad day at Palmy – surfies and clubbies at war!
      • When being a proven waterman is not enough!
      • The highs and lows of surfing Sunset Beach while competing at the Duke Kahanamoku Invitational
      • An American midnight surf – that goes very wrong!
  • What does it mean?
    • What is a snake?
    • What does “shag” mean?
    • What does “Freddy Jones” mean?
    • What does “hook and ladder” mean?
    • What does back walk-over mean?
  • Philosophers Sport Bar
    • Socrates and Aristotle debate football defence
    • Michel de Montaigne on coaching sports
    • Ancient philosophers discuss what makes the beautiful game beautiful! Laozi and Socrates get technical.

Excruciating jargon – Basketball and soccer at their worst!

February 22, 2018 By SOCRATES Leave a Comment Filed Under: Cultural and social issues, Sport and society

Two of the world’s greatest global games are rotten with jargon. Positively stinky with it! Why? I can’t say, for sure, but it has something to do with the fact that while both games crave growth and acknowledgment as the globe’s biggest and best sports they, ironically, seek to exclude outsiders by generating their own exclusive languages. Is basketball and soccer jargon meaningful and helpful in clarifying the technical aspects of these two highly technical sports? Sometimes… but not usually. More often than not, basketball and soccer jargon confuse communication and only succeed in enabling jargon speakers to feel like they are members of a special club.

What “hops” really look like

Here is a run-down of some of the most stupid expressions basketball and soccer dish up… and a description of what each means and why they are so brain-free.

Basketball

Got game

If you are desperate to show your mates that you speak fluent “hoops” (basketball) language and you have never been told that speaking jargon can lead to poor communication, then you will probably prefer to use the term he or she’s “got game” rather than saying, he or she plays well. If you don’t give a rat’s arse about trying to sound knowledgeable on basketball and its culture, you will prefer to stick to the traditional way of saying it.   

Hops

Like a bunny… she has “hops” apparently

Another basketball term that does nothing to enhance or clarify meaning is he or she “has hops.” Telling a parent that his daughter “has hops” is not only an attempt to ingratiate yourself to the parent but is also intended to impress him or her that you are a “hoops” expert. “Hops” is a light-weight piece of irony referring to a player’s outstanding jumping ability. The term was probably funny the first time it was used, but is now it’s just a piece of boorish jargon used by wannabes.

Not in my house

This is an annoying piece of brainless basketball jargon, used to describe an equally annoying and brainless piece of basketball play.  Frustratingly for coaches who hate the “not in my house” play, some stupid players still do it because spectators, who don’t know much about the game, and some commentators, love it because they think it is tough or something. “Not in my house” is the term used to describe the actions of a defensive player who spectacularly blocks a shot of an attacking opponent by swatting the ball brutally into the sixth row of the grand stand. The swat is often followed by a petulant and mocking wave of the finger by the blocker in the direction of the player who was swatted. The attempt at sledging is misguided in that the swat results in the attacking team being awarded possession and given another opportunity to score… ad they usually do! Coaches try to teach their defending big men to develop “soft hands” so that they can gently block the ball back into play, hopefully into the waiting arms of one of their team-mates, thus regaining possession. In Australia the National Basketball League’s top ten plays of the week often feature half a dozen “not in my house” plays making one wonder about whether the people at the NBL know much about the game. Any shot block that falls out of play is a wasted defensive opportunity and should be criticized, not praised.

Now this bloke really did know how to block. None of your brainless swatting the ball into the stands from Dikembe. The finger wag, on the other hand, was annoying.

He’s come to play

Here is another example of irony, or, more accurately, understatement common in the basketball world but not unknown in many other sports as well. If a player is having an especially strong match commentators and sideline experts might suggest that she or he has “come to play.” As is the case with “he’s got hops”, it might have been funny or witty the first time it was said but now it is just annoying. Not as annoying as saying “money ball” or “can’t get it to go” (these two are so annoying I can’t even bring myself to explain them) but almost!

Sending a message to the opposition

I think that this means that a player did something good, but I am not sure about that. In fact, I don’t have any idea what it means. It certainly means that the person who said it is a dickhead. 

Soccer

Shape

Shape is another one of those terms that is bandied around to show people that you understand the technical aspects of a sport and don’t give a stuff about clear communication. It is most common in soccer but also crops up in cricket, tennis, rugby, Australian Rules Football and many other sports. Like most pieces of shameless jargon, it causes the eyes of those who don’t closely follow the game or haven’t been watching the right television shows or reading the right sports magazines and manuals to glaze over. Go down to your local soccer pitch when kids are being coached and check out the puzzlement on their faces when the coach starts rabbiting on about “shape.”

Like all great players Luis has no idea what “shape” means.

The problem with the word is that it has slightly different meanings in different contexts and coaches and other experts rarely go to the trouble of demonstrating or explaining what they mean when they say it. In soccer it can mean the path through the air the ball takes after being kicked (in a shot or a pass) by a player… or it can mean the posture that a player adopts when he or she is addressing the ball or an opponent… or it can even mean the way that a group of players execute their offensive or defensive formations on the pitch. If you hear the word “shape” being used by someone either ignore them as someone who isn’t worth listening to or, if you must, ask them what the hell they are talking about.

“Quali-ee touch tha.” WTF?

Quality

Another soccer classic is the word quality… usually with the “t” not pronounced (quali-ee). If you have ever sat through a full game of soccer on tele the commentator will, likely, use the word quality twenty or thirty times throughout the game. “Quality shot, that!” “She’s a quality player.” “This is a quality game.” “We’ve got two quality teams here on the pitch today.” I’m not going to quibble over the use of a noun as an adjective because that kind of thing happens in the English language all the time and quibbling over grammar is about as wankerish as you can get. I will quibble over the way it is persistently used by soccer coaches, experts and commentators, though, because it fails to illustrate almost anything about a player, match, team, sequence of play or whatever other than the fact that it was “good”. Using the word quality to signify high quality tells us very little about an individual or event especially when it is used repeatedly with no elaboration. Our language is richer than that and a highly skilled player or play or team deserves to be described in much clearer language and richer detail than that they are quali-ee.

I think this is an example of ball watching. In fact almost any soccer image could be an example of ball watching in it… because they all do it.

Ball watching

This is a piece of soccer jargon that I can’t complain about because the term expresses a clear meaning and message that is critical to anyone who plays or has an interest in the game. My main concern with its use is that the expression is usually only employed in a narrow context when it should be recognized as being a problem all over the soccer pitch. Let me explain. Usually “ball watching” is the term used to describe a defensive player who is so focused on the path of the ball that he or she neglects to notice that the player they are supposed to be marking has slipped away from them. This often results in the “un-marked” player scoring a goal and making the “ball watching” marker look like an idiot. While this is indeed an example of ball watching, ball watching is endemic in soccer and shows itself in many other contexts as well. An example is the attacking mid-fielder who is so focused on the ball at his feet (and the one or two nearby players he may be intending to execute a “give-and-go” with) that he completely fails to notice the unmarked winger making a run down the side-line. Blatant ball watching! Or the defensive mid-fielder who is so concerned with maintaining possession that he unthinkingly fires the ball back to a full-back or centre-back when, if he had had his eyes open, he would have noticed a forward or another mid-fielder creating a leading run further up the pitch. Ball watching! The biggest single technical skill problem at every level of soccer is the inability of even elite players to keep their heads and eyes up and away from the ball long enough to see what their opponents and their team mates are doing and to see precisely where the goal is. Some of the worst ball watchers are the players regarded by their team mates as having sublime ball skills. I have no problem with the use of the term ball watching. I just wish it was used more often to criticize the tens of thousands of players guilty of it every day!  

One of millions of graphics available that show a typical soccer “formation”. Love it when coaches scream “hold your formation”. A well-coached soccer team can swap formations, then swap back in a blink of the eye. No need to “hold formation”.

Formation

The term formation exists in lots of sports but the sport that discusses it almost obsessively is soccer. Formation refers to the structure or way in which players of varying positions are instructed to arrange themselves on the pitch. Different soccer coaches swear by different formations. Some play a 4-2-3-1 pattern meaning four players in the defensive back line, with two defensive mid-fielders above them, a line of three attacking mid-fielders above them and a lone striker at the top of the formation. Other coaches argue for a 3-3-3-1 mix. Others prefer 4-5-1. Still others a 3-1-3-3. The constant debate over which formation is best is a bit of a joke really… for several reasons. Firstly, just about any formation (so long as it suits the abilities of the players in the various positions), can work just fine so long as the players are well coached in the system and can execute it well. A well-executed boring old system (or formation) will always work better than an ingenious and creative formation that is executed poorly. Great player skill, great teamwork and great execution of systems is much more important than any genius coach’s genius systems. Secondly, the importance of formation is over-rated because, in the cut and thrust of a dynamic game, good teams are constantly shifting from one formation to another and then back again all the time. Good strikers rotate back defensively… then forward again. Good left and right backs (Full-backs) swing forward into the front line often and then charge back again when needed. Good attacking midfielders become sweepers at a moment’s notice, then fly forward aggressively again when they can. Good play is dynamic play. Help a team mate. Then recover. Help. Recover. Help. Recover. Formation may not be irrelevant but it’s over-emphasized!

When you hear an expert or commentator doing a detailed analysis of a team’s formation you may as well tune out. What they are talking about is usually crap and has very little relevance to what will actually happen in a game.     

SOCRATES

Short, fat, slow, uncoordinated and clumsy, ancient Athenian Socrates had very few of the physical quality required of the elite athlete. He did have, on the other hand, a better than average brain between his ears and a mouth that could talk opposing players, referees and coaches half into their graves. Socrates, as a sport analyst, is what the world needs and misses. He is an opinionated so-and-so that actually thinks deeply about sport and adventuring and likes nothing better than provoking others into deep thought. Socrates is the antithesis of the sporting jock or the West Sydney soccer supporter.

Support Sportsocratic

Thanks for reading this story! We appreciate your visit to Sportsocratic… and love providing alternative information, opinions and angles from the sporting world. The world of sport is so full of the same old stuff from the same old sources that it drives us nuts… and it makes our day giving voice to less orthodox views. If you appreciate our free service, give some thought to helping us out. It costs us big bucks to keep Sportsocratic going but, if our readers support us, our future is much more secure.

Help us to keep you entertained and informed… and enable Socrates to keep asking those big philosophical sporting questions.

Support Sportsocratic for as little as a $1 and we would love you to bits. It only takes a few seconds!

Support Us

Tagged With: ball-watching, basketball, cliche, coach, formation, jargon, shape, soccer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

SOCRATES’ RECENT TWEETS

Tweets by Sportsocratic

Rugby Trivia

Olympics Rugby Teams – Who are the greatest?

April 23, 2020 By SOCRATES Leave a Comment

The rugby trivia question for the century! Which national rugby union team holds the record for the most Olympic gold medals in Rugby Union (the full-team fifteen a side game)?

Ethics and fairplay

Never cheated in my life!

November 19, 2020 By SOCRATES Leave a Comment

What is cheating? Is cheating a black and white moral issue… or are there shades of gray. Socrates spent twenty years in the engine room of the beautiful game of rugby… the scrum. He loved being a rugby hooker. He reckons that being slap bang in the middle of sixteen enormous, sweating blokes desperate to secure possession of the ball for their team taught him quite a bit about the fine art of cheating… what it is… and what it isn’t…. and how it can be done. Here Socrates lifts the veil on aspects of the workings of the 1970’s and 80’s amateur rugby scrum revealing some of its secrets. In so doing he shows that cheating is not a simple moral issue. he also claims to haver never deliberately cheated. Do you believe him?

Sport and the question of ethics

November 13, 2020 By SOCRATES Leave a Comment

“Come on. Get over it. Move on. It’s just a game!”

Most sports lovers have, at some stage of their sporting lives, experienced what they perceived to be a significant sporting injustice and had their complaints answered with just such a response. But is it “just a game?” Do injustices within the sporting realm have the potential to do real damage to individuals and to society. Socrates heard a story about a local sporting team who felt that they had been dudded by the organizers of their regional competition and he wondered whether their concerns about the perceived lack of fairness in their case and the potential consequences for all involved had any merit.

When Socrates heard former rugby referee and philosopher, Dr Simon Longstaff (Executive Director of The Ethics Centre), discussing the importance of ethics with great eloquence and passion on the radio he thought that he might be a good person to ask about whether ethics applies in sport and whether there are potential consequences for society when fair play in sport is sidestepped.

Simon was kind enough to agree to a chat. Click the pic to read the good stuff.

matildas

Aivi Luik interview – Matilda unsung hero

February 6, 2020 By SOCRATES Leave a Comment

In pub discussions about the Australian women’s football team’s most remarkable player the name Aivi Luik is not often the first one to come up. Socrates thinks that this might be a mistake and that the value of this remarkable athlete might be under-recognized. Check out her record of achievment in almost every corner of the football world. USA, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom, Spain, Australia. MVP awards. Championships. All star team selections. She has had a remarkable career by anyone’s standards and is still playing at her best at 34! With Luik and her fellow Matildas in camp preparing for their Olympic Games qualifying series matches against China, Thailand and Taiwan this week Socrates was grateful that she found time to answer some questions about her footballing life. Press here for the Aivi Luik interview – a must for all sports fans, especially ambitious young athletes considering overseas careers.

Outstanding achievement

Outstanding (but not well-known) sporting achievement

September 19, 2019 By SOCRATES Leave a Comment

Everyone has heard of Kelly Slater and his bucket load of world surfing titles. Michael Jordan and his multitude of NBA titles are pretty common knowledge too. Michael Schumacher’s six world driver’s championships are pretty well known as well. Here is a sporting achievement all three would be jealous of. Manly surfer Greg Mossop has a sporting achievement that these three champions could only dream of and Mossop believes that, with a bit of luck, he could have done even better!

New surfing podcast

One of Australia’s greatest ever surfers – one of surfing’s greatest story tellers – “Rabbit” Bartholomew – talks to award winning journalist Tim Baker about life, surfing and stuff. Perfect listening for lockdown entertainment.

professionalism

Priorities in times of Covid-19

April 14, 2020 By SOCRATES NEWS DESK Leave a Comment

Here is a story about a new kid in town who suddenly, as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, has to worry about how she will survive. At the same time, sports celebrities implore “loyal fans” to keep supporting their clubs financially. This kid…. and millions of others (many of them new kids in town) just WANT THEIR MONEY BACK. They need it! The elite sports leaders and many average punters come from totally different worlds. When someone asks the ones without jobs about how important the survival of professional sports teams is, I doubt that they have even given it any thought. They have more important things on their minds.

wisdom

Its just a job. Grass grows. Birds fly. Waves pound the sand. I beat people up. – Muhammad Ali

sport at mardi gras

Athletes in the LGBTQI Mardi Gras

March 12, 2019 By SOCRATES 2 Comments

Twenty-one different sports teams marched in this years Sydney Mardi Gras. That’s twenty-one groups of out and proud queer athletes. The LGBTQI community need to be “fearless” and queer athletes are no exception. Check out these fearless sporting clubs living it up on their night of night!

A life with horses

A life with horses – or Lulu in wonderland

August 8, 2018 By TIMOTHY EDWARDS Leave a Comment

It’s well known that playing sport can be a life-changing experience. For one mum, adventurer and businessperson, having a sporty pastime was more than life-changing. Lulu’s friendship with her horses has touched her and her daughter’s lives in a million ways and created a whole new life in an ever-changing wonderland for them both. But don’t think for a moment that their horses are the purpose built catalysts for their ideal lives! Its way more complex than that… and more respectful. Read on! It’s worth it!

wisdom

“Pressure? Pressure is a Messerschmidt up your arse. Playing cricket is not!”

Keith Miller

One of the greatest cricket “all-rounders” of all time, Keith Miller was not only an exceptional performer in multiple elements of test cricketing (batting, bowling and fielding) but he was also gifted in numerous other aspects of his life. Witty, entertaining, handsome, a renowned war time pilot and gifted Australian Rules Footballer, Miller was famed for calling a spade a spade and acknowledging that there was much more to life than elite sports. Having flown fighter bombers in the Second World War under life threatening circumstances he was not one to take the “pressure” of high level sport too seriously!

trivia

Here is a cracker of a trivia question.

Who was the college recruiting scout talking about when he said the following to his head coach.

“I’ve just seen a fat guy… who can play like the wind!”

Yup. The same guy who told people that just because they had shoes like his, it didn’t make them like him in any other way. Charles Wade Barkley.

Etymology

Where did the word canter come from?

August 8, 2018 By SOCRATES Leave a Comment

A bit more horsey stuff for people who liked the story next door. Here is a cracker bit of etymology for all you word lovers (and horse lovers) out there. Where does the word canter come from? You’ll never guess in a million years! Click here to find out. It’s a beauty!

What does it mean?

What is Elvis leg?

Admit it. You’ve never heard of “Elvis leg,” have you? What the blazes is “Elvis leg?” As is the case with every other “What does it mean…” story we have ever posted, the answer is not directly related to the name itself. It is indirectly related to Elvis, though. Have a guess what the relationship is… then click here and check out whether your were correct. Find out for certain which sport uses this term and what it means.

What is a liberator?

Of course most you aviation buffs will think that a liberator is an American WW2 heavy bomber. Fair enough. But in a sporting context does it have a completely different meaning? Indeed it does. You are going to have to click here to find out what a liberator is and does in the world of sport.

Aphorisms, insights and wisdom

“The thing that’s depressing about tennis is that no matter how good I get I will never be as good as a wall.”

More perceptive sporting analysis from Mitch Hedberg, comic genius.

 

ebook

Phillip has returned to the south of India after eighteen years. But who is the young girl staying in his hotel? And what will he learn about his estranged brother through Inez, the Spanish backpacker?

To buy The Bangalore Test, John Campbell’s new ebook novella, just click the link.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

©2019 Sportsocratic